Loss implies you haven't lost, denial implies it still exists

"Loss is not loss when properly perceived."

"For the separation is only the DENIAL of union, and, correctly interpreted, attests to your eternal knowledge that union is true."

"denial DEPENDS on the real belief in what is denied for its OWN existence."

You can gain some interesting insight here. Jesus is saying that when you deny something, you're really saying that you believe the thing still exists, but at the same time you are saying it doesn't. Denial isn't a state of TOTAL commitment to the belief that the thing is gone, it is only a partial and contradictory belief that the thing is not there - all the while still believing in it.

If for example you deny that God exists, you're really saying that you believe God exists on the other side of the denial, but you just don't want to admit to it. To deny God is to hide from the truth, and the truth cannot actually be changed or undone. It is always there, and always the same. Denial is only pretence, and an attempt to block awareness of the thing being there. But you must believe it is THERE, otherwise you wouldn't bother even using denial at all. And in truth, denying it ATTESTS to the belief in it.

As such denial when properly recognized, is literally saying "I believe in the existence of the thing that I am denying." And this recognition would suggest to you that there is no point in denying its existence, because you're really not denying it.

Similarly in the statement about loss, when you believe you are experiencing a loss, you MUST also be experiencing a belief that the thing you've lost IS STILL THERE. You cannot experience a sense of loss of something of value, unless you STILL value it. And in fact it is precisely because you DO value it and BELIEVE IN IT, that you are feeling a sense of "the loss of it".

This then tells you that even in the loss, the loss is not "only loss" or "pure loss". It is a mixed and conflicted state, a contradictory ego state, in which you are simultaneously saying "I have lost something" at the same time as "I believe in that something existing." If it exists, it is not lost. Only the notion that it has stopped existing can produce a sense of loss. But even in the loss, you're implying that it exists, so IS NOT lost.

When properly perceived and recognized then, loss is actually saying "I have not lost what I think I've lost." The loss is a contradictory self-defeating unfounded and false claim, in the same way as denial is a false claim. If you could recognize loss is NOT loss but rather the conviction that the thing IS THERE, you would not be able to be so committed to the attempt to only lose and not gain.

Jesus is suggesting then that there is a way out of all of our denials, all of our blocks to awareness, all of our senses of loss and lack and deprivation. If we can just 'reframe' it correctly and see the WHOLE of what we're doing, instead of thinking that we're ONLY in a state of loss or denial without an active belief in its opposite, then this could actually give us liberation. There would be no point feeling a sense of loss if it is recognized as contradicting the fact that you believe in what you've lost - and so it can't be lost because you believe it exists, even if you also believe it doesn't.

Denial then is only partly a belief in something not existing - a relative belief, not an absolute one. And similarly loss is only a relative belief that something is lost, and not an absolute loss. It is partly a belief in loss, but driven by also the belief in the presence of the thing, or person, or whatever. Correctly recognized, these states of denial and ego suffering are conflicted, two-faced, contradictory, self-cancelling, and not actually doing what they claim to be doing.

To think you can belief in loss without believing in gain is delusional. To think you can believe in denial without also believing in the thing you're denying, is delusional. You might as well just drop the denial and sense of lack and embrace the fact that you believe the thing still exists in its entirety, and be free of the suffering induced by trying to believe otherwise.

Perhaps then the real 'cause' of suffering is not denial or loss, but the conflicted state of mind which can't seem to commit fully either way to loss or gain, to presence or lack, to existence or non-existence. And really it is believing in BOTH at the same time, which is producing CONFLICT. And that conflict is experienced as suffering. It isn't "being opposite to what's true" that makes you suffer, it's the SPLIT MIND that is experiencing a war between the existence of opposite things.

"Belief does not require vigilance UNLESS it is conflicted."